nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dyn DDoS this AM?
From: Josh Reynolds <josh () kyneticwifi com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 19:10:45 -0500
Ah, disregard. I see what you're saying now. Yes, I can see how that would be problematic. On Oct 21, 2016 6:40 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <josh () kyneticwifi com> wrote:
Ansible would be a decent start. On Oct 21, 2016 5:26 PM, "David Birdsong" <david () imgix com> wrote:On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:anyone who relies on a single dns provider is just asking for stuff such as this. randyI'd love to hear how others are handling the overhead of managing two dns providers. Every time we brainstorm on it, we see it as blackhole of eng effort WRT to keeping them in sync and and then waiting for TTLs to cut an entire delegation over.
Current thread:
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM?, (continued)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? LHC (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? LHC (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Eitan Adler (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Suzanne Woolf (Oct 24)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? joel jaeggli (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Måns Nilsson (Oct 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Måns Nilsson (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Crist Clark (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Brett Frankenberger (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Josh Reynolds (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Josh Reynolds (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? - dns alvin nanog (Oct 21)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 22)
- Re: Dyn DDoS this AM? Ken Chase (Oct 22)