nanog mailing list archives
Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally
From: Eric Germann <ekgermann () semperen com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 12:06:07 -0400
IPSec and corporate. Customers will connect to their respective regional sites separately. Any ITAR concerns there?
On Oct 5, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote: On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Eric Germann <ekgermann () semperen com <mailto:ekgermann () semperen com>> wrote: I’ve been charged with building a global VPN as an overlay on top of a certain 3 letter company who also sells lots of stuff. you say 'vpn' do you mean 'mpls vpn' or 'ipsec vpn over intertubes' ? We’re looking at US East US West US Central (eventually) Brazil Singapore Frankfurt Ireland Sydney Maybe Canada Maybe India (outsourcesrs) In the planning stages now and wondering if there are any protocols I need to stay away from ITAR wise with this list of countries. Contemplating Suite B with GCM, etc and AES acceleration. most places dont' really care about encryption if your use is 'for corporate use', not providing use by external parties (internet access sorts of things), I believe.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
Current thread:
- Questions re: VPN protocols globally Eric Germann (Oct 05)
- Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally Peter Beckman (Oct 05)
- Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally Eric Germann (Oct 05)
- Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally Christopher Morrow (Oct 05)
- Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally Eric Germann (Oct 05)
- Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 05)
- Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally Florian Weimer (Oct 05)
- Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally Eric Germann (Oct 05)
- Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally Peter Beckman (Oct 05)