nanog mailing list archives
Re: pay.gov and IPv6
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:03:58 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Mark Andrews wrote:
Why the hell should validating resolver have to work around the crap you guys are using? DO YOUR JOBS which is to use RFC COMPLIANT servers. You get PAID to do DNS because people think you are compentent to do the job. Evidence shows otherwise. https://ednscomp.isc.org/compliance/gov-full-report.html show the broken servers for .gov. It isn't hard to check.
Engineer complains the universe doesn't match his assumptions.
Current thread:
- Re: pay.gov and IPv6, (continued)
- Re: pay.gov and IPv6 Carl Byington (Nov 17)
- Re: pay.gov and IPv6 Lee (Nov 18)
- Re: pay.gov and IPv6 Carl Byington (Nov 18)
- Re: pay.gov and IPv6 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Nov 18)
- Re: pay.gov and IPv6 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Nov 20)
- Re: pay.gov and IPv6 Carl Byington (Nov 20)
- Re: pay.gov and IPv6 Mark Andrews (Nov 20)
- Re: pay.gov and IPv6 Carl Byington (Nov 20)
- Re: pay.gov and IPv6 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Nov 20)
- Re: pay.gov and IPv6 joel jaeggli (Nov 21)
- Re: pay.gov and IPv6 Sean Donelan (Nov 18)
- Re: pay.gov and IPv6 Florian Weimer (Nov 18)
- Re: pay.gov and IPv6 Mark Andrews (Nov 18)