nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers

From: Ken Chase <math () sizone org>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 10:06:39 -0400

got a quagga router in my life where bgpd+zebra takes up 1gig for 4.5 full
tables. Rest of the OS easily lives in 1 gig (could probably be much less.)
big-vendor solutions always seem much bloatier - same deal on power usage.

just a data point.

/kc
--
Ken Chase - math () sizone org Toronto

Current thread:

Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers, (continued)
- - - Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers William Herrin (May 03)
    - Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Nick Hilliard (May 03)
    - Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers William Herrin (May 03)
    - RE: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Chuck Church (May 04)
    - Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Blake Hudson (May 04)
    - Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Blake Hudson (May 03)
    - Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Carlos Alcantar (May 03)
    - Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Blake Hudson (May 03)
    - Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Łukasz Bromirski (May 03)
    - SV: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Gustav Ulander (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Ken Chase (May 03)