nanog mailing list archives
Re: Public DNS64
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 17:27:41 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 30 May 2016, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
...so specifically regarding the idea of a public, anycast NAT64 service, rather than the public DNS64 service Google is doing.
Like HE is doing? swmike@uplift:~$ dig +short AAAA ipv4.swm.pp.se @nat64.he.net 2001:470:64:ffff::d4f7:c88f swmike@uplift:~$ ping6 2001:470:64:ffff::d4f7:c88fPING 2001:470:64:ffff::d4f7:c88f(2001:470:64:ffff::d4f7:c88f) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2001:470:64:ffff::d4f7:c88f: icmp_seq=1 ttl=42 time=316 ms 64 bytes from 2001:470:64:ffff::d4f7:c88f: icmp_seq=2 ttl=42 time=315 msNow, pinging myself via DNS64/NAT64 service and getting 315ms RTT means the NAT64 isn't very local to me... :P
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Public DNS64 Tim Durack (May 29)
- Re: Public DNS64 Baldur Norddahl (May 29)
- Re: Public DNS64 Baldur Norddahl (May 29)
- Re: Public DNS64 Mark Andrews (May 29)
- Re: Public DNS64 Hugo Slabbert (May 30)
- Re: Public DNS64 Mikael Abrahamsson (May 30)
- Re: Public DNS64 Mark Andrews (May 30)
- Re: Public DNS64 Baldur Norddahl (May 30)
- Re: Public DNS64 Ca By (May 30)
- Re: Public DNS64 Mark Tinka (May 30)
- Re: Public DNS64 Baldur Norddahl (May 29)
- Re: Public DNS64 Baldur Norddahl (May 29)