nanog mailing list archives

Re: Standards for last mile performance


From: Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 16:09:12 -0700

It hugely depends on the physical layout of the homes/area for economics of
active-E vs GPON...  The scale of the outside plant aerial fiber is very
different in certain scenarios. A green field modern housing development
with everything underground might be very different than a semi-rural chain
shaped topology of GPON along a road of houses on 1 acre plots. Or an urban
townhouse development. Or a 35 floor condo tower.



On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:



On 1/May/16 10:55, Josh Reynolds wrote:

No. Active has higher initial and ongoing plant costs (cabinet power,
cabinet wear and tear, more battery banks, chargers, etc). You also
end up using far, far less fiber strands.


I tend to disagree, but this is one of those debates that could go on
forever...

Lord knows I've been having it since 2008.

Mark.



Current thread: