nanog mailing list archives
Re: Standards for last mile performance
From: Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 16:09:12 -0700
It hugely depends on the physical layout of the homes/area for economics of active-E vs GPON... The scale of the outside plant aerial fiber is very different in certain scenarios. A green field modern housing development with everything underground might be very different than a semi-rural chain shaped topology of GPON along a road of houses on 1 acre plots. Or an urban townhouse development. Or a 35 floor condo tower. On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
On 1/May/16 10:55, Josh Reynolds wrote:No. Active has higher initial and ongoing plant costs (cabinet power, cabinet wear and tear, more battery banks, chargers, etc). You also end up using far, far less fiber strands.I tend to disagree, but this is one of those debates that could go on forever... Lord knows I've been having it since 2008. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Mark Tinka (May 01)
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Josh Reynolds (May 01)
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Mark Tinka (May 01)
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Josh Reynolds (May 01)
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Eric Kuhnke (May 02)
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Mark Tinka (May 01)
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Josh Reynolds (May 01)
- Re: Standards for last mile performance Josh Reynolds (May 01)