nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST NTP servers
From: Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 21:20:42 -0500
Once upon a time, John Souvestre <john () souvestre com> said:
The Enhanced WWVB signal has better range and more accuracy, but I don't know if any receivers are available yet.
I know it's supposed to have better range and signal quality, but I thought accuracy was about the same. The variables that affect accuracy are mostly external to the signal itself (propagation delay affected by atmospheric conditions). At one point, they were going to put a second transmitter closer to the east coast, and it was going to be at the Army's Redstone Arsenal, next to Huntsville, AL, where I live; I probably could have put a receiver in a steel box and still had good signal! NASA vetoed it though. -- Chris Adams <cma () cmadams net>
Current thread:
- Re: NIST NTP servers, (continued)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Lamar Owen (May 13)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Mel Beckman (May 13)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Lamar Owen (May 13)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Mel Beckman (May 13)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Mel Beckman (May 13)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Lamar Owen (May 14)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Laszlo Hanyecz (May 13)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Chuck Anderson (May 13)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Sharon Goldberg (May 13)
- RE: NIST NTP servers John Souvestre (May 12)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Chris Adams (May 12)
- RE: NIST NTP servers John Souvestre (May 12)
- RE: NIST NTP servers Chuck Church (May 11)
- Re: NIST NTP servers George Herbert (May 12)
- RE: NIST NTP servers Allan Liska (May 11)
- RE: NIST NTP servers Chuck Church (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Mike (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Laszlo Hanyecz (May 10)
- Re: NIST NTP servers Harlan Stenn (May 10)