nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 22:18:28 +0200
On 2/May/16 21:07, Mike wrote:
Hello, I have an ASR1000 router with 4gb of ram. The specs say I can get '1 million routes' on it, but as far as I have been advised, a full table of internet routes numbers more than 530k by itself, so taking 2 full tables seems to be out of the question (?).
Sounds like you have enough router resources to do your peering and take 2 full feeds. Mark.
Current thread:
- BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Mike (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers James Milko (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers lincoln dale (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Mark Tinka (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Bob Evans (May 02)
- RE: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Gustav Ulander (May 02)
- RE: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Tony Wicks (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Blake Hudson (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Richard Hicks (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Mark Tinka (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers William Herrin (May 03)
- RE: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Eric Sabotta (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Mike (May 02)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Blake Hudson (May 03)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers Mike (May 02)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers James Milko (May 02)