nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPV6 planning
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 16:33:28 -0800
On Mar 7, 2016, at 16:01 , Alarig Le Lay <alarig () swordarmor fr> wrote: On Mon Mar 7 15:51:06 2016, Owen DeLong wrote:To the best of my knowledge, Windows actually generates three addresses… 1. Subnet Stable quasi-randomized address unrelated (or at least not reversable to) MAC address. 2. Privacy address which rotates frequently (for some definition of frequently). 3. Stable address related to MAC address. The 3rd one is standard SLAAC. The second one is standard privacy extensions. THe first one is unique to Windows. You’ll get the same address every time you connect to the same subnet, but you won’t see that suffix for that host on any other subnet.It’s not exactly specific to Windows, dhcpcd use a something like that (my IPv6 is 2a00:5884:8316:2653:fd40:d47d:556f:c426). And at least, there is a RFC related to that, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7217.
Yes, but in the case of Windows, that happens with SLAAC without DHCP. TTBOMK, this is unique to windows. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: IPV6 planning, (continued)
- Re: IPV6 planning Karl Auer (Mar 05)
- Re: IPV6 planning Saku Ytti (Mar 05)
- Re: IPV6 planning Karl Auer (Mar 05)
- Re: IPV6 planning Saku Ytti (Mar 06)
- Re: IPV6 planning Tore Anderson (Mar 06)
- Re: IPV6 planning Karl Auer (Mar 06)
- Re: IPV6 planning Baldur Norddahl (Mar 06)
- Re: IPV6 planning Karl Auer (Mar 06)
- Re: IPV6 planning Owen DeLong (Mar 07)
- Re: IPV6 planning Alarig Le Lay (Mar 07)
- Re: IPV6 planning Owen DeLong (Mar 07)
- Re: IPV6 planning Bjørn Mork (Mar 08)
- Re: IPV6 planning Enno Rey (Mar 08)
- Re: IPV6 planning Saku Ytti (Mar 05)
- Re: IPV6 planning Baldur Norddahl (Mar 07)
- Re: IPV6 planning Karl Auer (Mar 05)