Re: IPv4 Legacy assignment frustration

[Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>]

how is this a problem with  the RIR ?

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian <
ops.lists () gmail com> wrote:

> There is absolutely no budgeting for idiots.  Beyond a long hard process
> that is helped by internal escalations from affected people on a corporate
> network - ideally as senior as you can get - ot their IT staff.  “Missouri
> isn’t in China, you nitwit.  Fix it or I, the CFO, will go have a word with
> the CIO and ..”
>
> In other words, have affected people escalate up the chain to the ISP or
> more likely corporate IT team that’s doing this sort of stupid filteringg.
>
> > On 21-Jun-2016, at 8:07 PM, Spurling, Shannon <shannon () more net> wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure how many on the list are Legacy resource holders from
> before the RIR's were established, but there is an extremely short sighted
> security practice that is being used across the internet.
> > Apparently, the RIR that has been given "authority" for an IP prefix
> range that was a legacy assignment is being used as a geographical locator
> for those prefixes. For instance, we provide access for several /16's that
> are in the 150/8 prefix that was set as APNIC. I am aware of quite a few
> organizations in the US that have prefixes in that range. We have
> registered our legacy resources with ARIN, but there are some people insist
> that somehow the state of Missouri must be part of China because...
> "APNIC!". They set firewalls and access rules based on that, and are hard
> pressed to not fix them.
> > Is there any way to raise awareness to this inconsistency so that
> security people will stop doing this?