nanog mailing list archives

Re: Equinix IX Port Moves


From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:18:47 -0500 (CDT)

The second option. 

Well, there is the first under process too, but the second is the priority at the moment. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com> 
To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> 
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org> 
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:46:17 AM 
Subject: Re: Equinix IX Port Moves 







On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Mike Hammett < nanog () ics-il net > wrote: 


Who has moved an Equinix IX port? We're told that it's a full cancellation, re-order, re IPs, re-peering, etc. 

Can anyone lend any input either way on that? 







there are 2 meanings (at least) to 'move', did you mean: 
1) move port from 1G to 10G (or 'change speed') 
2) move port from cage/rack1 to cage/rack2 (endpoint move in your space(s) ) 


<blockquote>



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

</blockquote>



Current thread: