nanog mailing list archives
Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:08:48 -0400
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
On 10/Jun/16 16:47, Christopher Morrow wrote: so I can't be a customer of you and a network you peer with? You can, but we won't learn your paths via the peering session we would have with your other ISP.
oh, so I didn't misunderstand.. that makes 'backup isp' less useful, no?
Current thread:
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention, (continued)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Joe Provo (Jun 08)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 08)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) (Jun 09)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Job Snijders (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Leo Bicknell (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Joe Provo (Jun 11)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Hugo Slabbert (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Randy Bush (Jun 10)