Re: Bogon ASN Filter Policy

[Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>]

On 8/Jun/16 14:56, Michael Hare wrote:

> I'm not against the theory of what is being proposed, but I was surprised to see little discussion of this 
> announcement on list.
>
> Upon examination on my view of the DFZ from AS3128 I see over 400 upstream routes falling into this category, mostly 
> in the 64512 - 65534 range.  Based on our flow bandwidth stats we chose to reach out to several origin ASN, two 
> fairly well known, as a courtesy.
>
> For the *TT's who are planning on implementing shortly, have you went through a similar diagnostic effort and what 
> might you share or report on such endeavors?

At the very least, "remove-private-as" should be a standard step in the
procedure of turning up any eBGP session.

Mark.