Re: IPv6 deployment excuses

[Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com>]

On Mon 2016-Jul-04 12:42:33 -0400, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Matt Hoppes <
> mattlists () rivervalleyinternet net> wrote:
>
> > Except the lady will eventually downsize. The college student will want
> > more and lease the space.
> >
> > Also, the 49,000 Sq ft office space that has been leased for 10 years and
> > never occupied will be taken back and released to someone who will actually
> > develop it.
>
> and as has been covered numerous times here and other places the lifetime
> of a /8 in the global pool is ~1month.
>
> so.. you bought essentially nothing. The math that matters is: 7b people -
> 3b ips == 4b lost connections.

...and even that is generous as it assumes 1 device per person and strictly 
peer-to-peer traffic with no servers or even any addresses on routers and 
their interfaces.

Reference to NAT as a saviour in 3...2...1...

--
Hugo Slabbert       | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo () slabnet com
pgp key: B178313E   | also on Signal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature