nanog mailing list archives
IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers
From: Ricardo Ferreira <ricardofbferreira () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 10:54:48 +0200
Is there anyone here working in an ISP where IPv6 is deployed? We are starting to plan the roll-out IPv6 to mobile subscribers (phones) I am interesting in knowing the mask you use for the assignment; whether it is /64 or /128. In RFC 3177, it says: 3. Address Delegation Recommendations The IESG and the IAB recommend the allocations for the boundary between the public and the private topology to follow those general rules: - /48 in the general case, except for very large subscribers. - /64 when it is known that one and only one subnet is needed by design. - /128 when it is absolutely known that one and only one device is connecting. Basically a sole device will be connecting to the internet so I am wondering if this rule is follwed. Cheers -- Ricardo Ferreira
Current thread:
- IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ricardo Ferreira (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers james machado (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ryan, Spencer (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ca By (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Baldur Norddahl (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Ryan, Spencer (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Tore Anderson (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Baldur Norddahl (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Mikhail Gusarov (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 22)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers Carsten Bormann (Jul 23)
- Re: IPv6 Deployment for Mobile Subscribers james machado (Jul 22)