nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 deployment excuses
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 11:42:22 +0200
On 2/Jul/16 17:35, Ruairi Carroll wrote:
- ECMP issues (Mostly around flow labels and vendor support for that, also feeds back into PMTUD issues)
Do you rely on the ToS field in IPv4 for ECMP?
- Maintaining 2x IP stacks is inherently expensive Vs 1
How so? Mark.
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 deployment excuses, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 deployment excuses Gary Wardell (Jul 01)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Alarig Le Lay (Jul 01)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Hugo Slabbert (Jul 01)
- RE: IPv6 deployment excuses Gary Wardell (Jul 01)
- RE: IPv6 deployment excuses Gary Wardell (Jul 01)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mike Jones (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Ruairi Carroll (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses William Astle (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Denis Fondras (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Jared Mauch (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Tinka (Jul 03)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Tinka (Jul 03)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Ruairi Carroll (Jul 03)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Tinka (Jul 03)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Ruairi Carroll (Jul 03)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Tore Anderson (Jul 03)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Tinka (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Tore Anderson (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Tinka (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Ruairi Carroll (Jul 02)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Matt Hoppes (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Mark Andrews (Jul 04)
- Re: IPv6 deployment excuses Matt Hoppes (Jul 04)