nanog mailing list archives
Re: Leap Second planned for 2016
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:27:04 -0400
Time is actually harder than it seems. Many bits of software break in unexpected ways. Expect the unexpected. Jared Mauch On Jul 8, 2016, at 6:53 PM, Javier J <javier () advancedmachines us> wrote:
Time to start preparingUnless you are running something that can't handle leap seconds what do you really need to prepare for?On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Andrew Gallo <akg1330 () gmail com> wrote: Looks like we'll have another second in 2016: http://www.space.com/33361-leap-second-2016-atomic-clocks.html Time to start preparing
Current thread:
- Leap Second planned for 2016 Andrew Gallo (Jul 07)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Javier J (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Andrew Kirch (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Hal Ponton (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Eric Tykwinski (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Andrew Kirch (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Jared Mauch (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Saku Ytti (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Harlan Stenn (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Patrick W. Gilmore (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Chris Adams (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Eric S. Raymond (Jul 09)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 A . L . M . Buxey (Jul 09)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Falsehoods programmers believe about time, etc (was Re: Leap Second planned for 2016) Jay R. Ashworth (Jul 10)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Javier J (Jul 08)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Saku Ytti (Jul 09)
- Re: Leap Second planned for 2016 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 09)