nanog mailing list archives
Re: www.RT.com bad dns record
From: Matt Palmer <mpalmer () hezmatt org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:33:42 +1000
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:36:23PM -0700, Ca By wrote:
On Thursday, July 7, 2016, Spencer Ryan <sryan () arbor net> wrote:Dotted-quad notation is completely valid, and works fine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_address#Presentation http://[::ffff:37.48.108.112] loads fine in my browsers.It may be legit on your network, but people generally don't do that.... If they publish a aaaa record, it usually has a legit v6 address in it.
That is a legit IPv6 address. That it won't work on a host that is IPv6-only is a different issue, and one I agree is probably an unexpected and unwanted side effect. - Matt
Current thread:
- www.RT.com bad dns record Ca By (Jul 07)
- Re: www.RT.com bad dns record Spencer Ryan (Jul 07)
- Re: www.RT.com bad dns record Ca By (Jul 07)
- Re: www.RT.com bad dns record Matt Palmer (Jul 07)
- Re: www.RT.com bad dns record Baldur Norddahl (Jul 08)
- Interesting Article on Modulation Schemes Rod Beck (Jul 08)
- Re: Interesting Article on Modulation Schemes Eric Kuhnke (Jul 08)
- Re: Interesting Article on Modulation Schemes Rod Beck (Jul 08)
- Re: Interesting Article on Modulation Schemes Eric Kuhnke (Jul 08)
- Re: Interesting Article on Modulation Schemes Rod Beck (Jul 08)
- Re: www.RT.com bad dns record Ca By (Jul 07)
- Re: www.RT.com bad dns record Spencer Ryan (Jul 07)
- RE: www.RT.com bad dns record Tony Hain (Jul 08)