nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:01:36 -0800
The pessimistic side of me believes cloudflare and akamai want the internet to be choked with bots such that everyone must pay their toll, so the information on the bots is a trade secret... But please prove me wrong so we can drive higher accountability on the internet.
I am not speaking for Akamai here and I have nothing to do with dDOS product development there. However, I will say that there is great expense involved in collecting the kind of data you are now asking them to aggregate and release for free and there is commercial value in selling protection services. However, just as there is great value in providing health care services, I doubt that physicians are out there cheering for disease and affliction. I’m quite certain we would all be happy to market other services in the absence of a need for dDOS mitigation services. However, if you want to see this kind of data captured and disseminated for free, I suggest you build a consortium to do so and find a way to fund it. I have no input into the decision, but I think it would be absurd for a commercial entity to give away data which is so expensive to obtain. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: de-peering for security sake, (continued)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Doug Barton (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Dan Hollis (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 18)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Michael O'Connor (Jan 19)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 19)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Colin Johnston (Jan 20)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Jan 16)