nanog mailing list archives
Re: de-peering for security sake
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 09:53:40 -0500
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 05:43:56AM -0800, Ca By wrote:
I see a great deal of folks on nanog clamoring to buy ddos gear. Packets are starting to become like spam email, where 90% are pure rubbish, and us good guys have to spend a lot of money and time sorting signal from noise.
I've said this many times: abuse does not magically fall out of the sky. It comes from hosts, on networks, run by people. It is time -- well past time -- to hold those people *personally* acountable. Not doing so leaves us where we are today: millions -- heck, hundreds of millions -- of dollars are being spent on defenses THAT WOULD NOT BE NECESSARY if those people performed their jobs at a mere baseline level of competence and diligence. ---rsk
Current thread:
- Re: de-peering for security sake Richard Hesse (Jan 02)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Randy Bush (Jan 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: de-peering for security sake Rich Kulawiec (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Mike Hammett (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Rich Kulawiec (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Owen DeLong (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 16)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Dan Hollis (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake bzs (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Doug Barton (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Dan Hollis (Jan 17)
- Re: de-peering for security sake Ca By (Jan 16)