nanog mailing list archives
Re: TransPacific Partnership
From: Matt Hoppes <mhoppes () indigowireless com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 19:07:12 -0500
My understanding was if it all goes through here in the US as proposed ISPs would have to provide real time monitoring of data Not as part of CALEA but as part of NSA surveilance.
On Jan 3, 2016, at 18:54, Tom Berryman <Tom () connectivityit com au> wrote: G'Day Matt, I'm here in Australia - and yes we are all well aware of the "benefits" of the TPP. What do you mean by burned? As in the additional accounting and administration overhead of doing business with operators in TPP participating countries? Also, will you be attending PTC? Regards, Tom Berryman Tom Berryman | CTO Connectivity I.T. PTY LTD ABN: 41128650635 1300 22 46 00 (+61356224600) | tom () connectivityit com au | AS-58511 www.connectivityit.com.au | facebook.com/connectivityit | twitter.com/connectivityit -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes Sent: Monday, 4 January 2016 10:32 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: TransPacific Partnership Has anyone heard any more regarding the TPP and the proposed additional monitoring burdens that would be put on ISPs?
Current thread:
- TransPacific Partnership Matt Hoppes (Jan 03)
- Message not available
- Re: TransPacific Partnership Matt Hoppes (Jan 03)
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: TransPacific Partnership tglassey () earthlink net (Jan 05)