nanog mailing list archives
Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX
From: Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:44:06 +0300
Yep, Broadcom doing thing right way! :) But unfortunately they (Cisco Nexus) are pretty expensive and fairly new for DC and ISP market. It's pretty rare to find big company with switching backbone on Nexus switches. But I like this direction of switch silicom unification :) Focus moved from "network brands" with Not Invented Here syndrome to enough smart agnostic hardware vendors. On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Nikolay Shopik <shopik+lists () nvcube net> wrote:
Cisco Nexus switches support sflow, since they are broadcom based. On 29/02/16 10:26, Pavel Odintsov wrote:Cisco do not support this protocol at all (that's pretty weird, really).
-- Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
Current thread:
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX, (continued)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Roland Dobbins (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Roland Dobbins (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Edward Dore (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Edward Dore (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nikolay Shopik (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Pavel Odintsov (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Saku Ytti (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX sthaug (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Saku Ytti (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Nick Hilliard (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Saku Ytti (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Phil Bedard (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Saku Ytti (Feb 29)
- Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX Avi Freedman (Feb 28)