nanog mailing list archives
Re: Thank you, Comcast.
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 13:50:18 -0500
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:52:55 -0500, Jay Nugent said:
However, if a 'provider' wishes to block ANYTHING, then they need to inform the customer IN WRITING exactly what will be blocked so that customer doesn't waste their time and money with said (limited) service and vote with their wallet by buying *real* Internet service, elsewhere.
Which is only an option in those rare places where there's actual real competition. In most places, it's a monopoly, or a non-functional duopoly (Let's face it - how many users will protest a 10M cable connection with 4 ports punched out by moving to 768K DSL?)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Thank you, Comcast., (continued)
- RE: Thank you, Comcast. Jay Nugent (Feb 26)
- Re: Thank you, Comcast. Roland Dobbins (Feb 26)
- Re: Thank you, Comcast. John Levine (Feb 26)
- Re: Thank you, Comcast. Roland Dobbins (Feb 26)
- Re: Thank you, Comcast. John Levine (Feb 26)
- Re: Thank you, Comcast. Roland Dobbins (Feb 26)
- Re: Thank you, Comcast. John Levine (Feb 26)
- Re: Thank you, Comcast. Roland Dobbins (Feb 26)
- RE: Thank you, Comcast. Keith Medcalf (Feb 26)
- Re: Thank you, Comcast. Roland Dobbins (Feb 26)
- Re: Thank you, Comcast. Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 26)
- Re: Thank you, Comcast. John Levine (Feb 26)
- Re: Thank you, Comcast. Jared Mauch (Feb 26)
- Re: Thank you, Comcast. Curtis Maurand (Feb 26)
- Re: Thank you, Comcast. Rich Kulawiec (Feb 26)
- Re: Thank you, Comcast. John Kristoff (Feb 26)