nanog mailing list archives
Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization
From: Dale Shaw <dale.shaw+nanog () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 20:42:05 +1100
G'day Leo, On 28 December 2016 at 07:10, Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org> wrote:
In a message written on Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 03:36:10PM -0500, Chris
Grundemann wrote:
If you have a case study, lesson learned, data point, or even just a
strong
opinion; I'd love to hear it!I think the high level items are pretty clear here:
[...]
2 Vendor Can be implemented multiple ways, for instance 1 vendor per site alternating sites, or gear deployed in pairs with one from each vendor up and down the stack. Harder to implement, staff needs to know both, all configs must be done for both, vendors will always blame the other vendor for interop issues. Twice as much chance of needing to do emergency upgrades. More resilliance to a single bug, can compare real world performance of the two vendors. Both vendors will compete hard to get more of your business, but have a harder time justifing bennies internally due to lower spend.
[...] I agree with many of the points you made but here's another data point on the topic of bugs -- I watched a presentation [1] from a couple of guys from Facebook at AusNOG 2016 and one of the takeaways from their talk was that "multivendor is hard". When you have two vendors, you get Vendor A's bugs, Vendor B's bugs, and the Vendor A+B interop bugs. In theory this only gets worse with 3+ vendors. Cheers, Dale [1] < http://www.ausnog.net/sites/default/files/ausnog-2016/presentations/2.10.6_Zaid_Hammoudi_AusNOG2016_Lightning.pdf
Current thread:
- Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization, (continued)
- Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization Christopher Morrow (Dec 28)
- Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization Randy Bush (Dec 28)
- Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization David Barak via NANOG (Dec 28)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization Chris Grundemann (Dec 29)
- Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization Randy Bush (Dec 29)
- Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization Leo Bicknell (Dec 29)
- Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 29)
- Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization Leo Bicknell (Dec 29)
- Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization joel jaeggli (Dec 29)
- Re: Benefits (and Detriments) of Standardizing Network Equipment in a Global Organization Chad Dailey (Dec 29)