nanog mailing list archives

Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase


From: Harlan Stenn <stenn () nwtime org>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:05:58 -0800



On 12/22/16 4:11 PM, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Dec 20, 2016, at 8:02 PM, Harlan Stenn <stenn () nwtime org>
wrote:

On 12/20/16 7:27 PM, Laurent Dumont wrote: To be honest, the fact
that NTP is still something managed by volunteers and not a
regulated entity (a bit like DNS) is mind boggling.

Time *is* managed by regulated entities - the National Time Labs.

That was pretty clearly not what Laurent was talking about.

Not all that clearly, at least to me.

And Network Time Foundation's NTP Project (the reference
implementation for NTP) could do lots more if we had a useful
budget.

Folks pay money for DNS registrations.  There's no revenue stream
around "time".

Help us get enough support to NTF, and we'll have the staff and 
infrastructure to do more for folks.

What does the NTF have to do with the NTP Pool (or the “recent NTP
pool traffic increase”)?

Nothing.  But it has to do with companies putting NTP into their
products.  When they do this with problematic configurations, it causes
trouble.  In this case, it was trouble for the Pool project.

The NTP Pool project certainly isn't the place to solve this issue.

The NTP Pool is run by volunteers, as you very well know. Both the
management and DNS system and the thousands of people who contribute
their NTP service to the system. (And we manage on a pretty scarce
budget).

What's your point?

This sort of misconfiguration will happen and the NTP Pool Project
clearly isn't the place to solve this problem overall.  It *is*
something NTF is in a position to address.

And we're almost exclusively an overstretched volunteer organization,
too, as you very well know.

Do we have different goals around this issue?

-- 
Harlan Stenn <stenn () nwtime org>
http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!


Current thread: