nanog mailing list archives

Re: Arista unqualified SFP


From: Ryan Gelobter <ryan.g () atwgpc net>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:05:52 -0500

But that is all done in the python script I imagine, it doesn't look like
theirs really much validation unless I'm missing something. Shouldn't be
too hard to figure out what its doing in the background after you run that
command.

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Ryan, Spencer <sryan () arbor net> wrote:

It won't work. They require the hashed key that support/your AM has to
generate for your org.



* Spencer Ryan* | Senior Systems Administrator | sryan () arbor net
*Arbor Networks*
+1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m)
www.arbornetworks.com

------------------------------
*From:* NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of Ryan Gelobter <
ryan.g () atwgpc net>
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 23, 2016 10:58:36 AM
*To:* Stanislaw
*Cc:* nanog list
*Subject:* Re: Arista unqualified SFP

Instead of patching the python what happens if you just run 'no errdisable
recovery cause xcvr-unsupported'

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Stanislaw <me () nek0 net> wrote:

Hi all,
If somebody is following my epic adventure of getting uqualified SFP to
work on Aristas, here is the unhappy end of it.

I've written to Arista support and got the following dialogue:
Support guy:
Hi,
Thank you for contacting Arista Support. My name is **** and I'll be
assisting you on this case.
Could you please provide the "show version" output from this switch?

Me:
Hi,
Here it is:
<show version output here>

Support guy:
Hi,
Thank you for the information.
Unfortunately, we are unable to activate your 3rd party components. To
ensure ongoing quality, Arista devices are designed to support only
properly qualified transceivers.
Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Me:
I do not understand,
But there is a command which allows using non-Arista transceivers. Why
have you implemented it but don't provide an access key to your customers
when they ask for it?
If it is required to sign some papers which declare that I am aware of
all
the risks and losing my warranty - I agree with that, lets do it. Any way
what are the conditions to receive that access key?

Support guy:
I'm afraid that there is nothing I'm able to do regarding this situation.
If you have any other questions regarding enabling 3rd party options in
Arista switches, I suggest to contact your local account team (or sales)
for further discussion on this matter.


Next, i've tried inserting various QSFP+ DAC cables I have - none of them
has been even detected on the switch, it was acting like nothing has been
inserted. I guess that even if I get the key, most of my transceivers/DAC
(which work like a champ in Juniper or Extreme switches) cables wouldnt
work.

I'm writing this post to make somebody who considers buying their
switches
be aware of what they'd get. Just buy Juniper instead.



Stanislaw wrote at 2016-08-17 23:25:

Hi Tim,

Thanks for your expressive answer. Will try it :)

Tim Jackson писал 2016-08-17 22:57:

I'd suggest bitching and moaning at your account team & support until
they give you the key to unlock them..

--
Tim

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Stanislaw <me () nek0 net> wrote:

Hi all,
Is there a way for unlocking off-brand transceivers usage on Arista
switches?

I've got an Arista 7050QX switch with 4.14 EOS version. Then it has
been found out that Arista switches seem to not have possibility to
unlock
off-brand xcievers usage (by some service command or so).

I've patched /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/XcvrAgent.py, made the
checking function bypass the actual check and it helped: ports are
not in
errdisable state anymore. But despite of xceivers are detected
correctly,
links aren't coming up (they are in notconnect state).

If anyone possibly have does have a sacred knowledge of bringing
off-branded transceivers to life on Arista switches, your help'd be
very
appreciated. Thanks.





Current thread: