nanog mailing list archives
Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology
From: David Barak via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:28:10 -0700
Simpler > complex *sometimes*. It turns out that sometimes the complexity is worth it (eg https://youtu.be/-iiXsbrEv3U ). Perhaps "as simple as possible, by no simpler" would be reasonable? David Barak Sent from mobile device, please excuse autocorrection artifacts
On Aug 2, 2016, at 7:08 PM, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote CB Ps. Also, simpler > complex. Lots of $ in this statement.
Current thread:
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology, (continued)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Ca By (Aug 02)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Eric Kuhnke (Aug 02)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Christopher Morrow (Aug 02)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Randy Bush (Aug 03)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Ca By (Aug 03)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Christopher Morrow (Aug 03)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology jim deleskie (Aug 03)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Mark Tinka (Aug 03)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Hugo Slabbert (Aug 04)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Eric Kuhnke (Aug 02)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Ca By (Aug 02)
- Re: NFV Solution Evaluation Methodology Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 02)