nanog mailing list archives
Re: Arista unqualified SFP
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:45:31 +0200
On 18/Aug/16 14:42, Nick Hilliard wrote:
It is always better to clarify this sort of thing with the account management team before purchasing, and preferably have it in email or writing. After that, the best approach is to ask support and/or account management nicely rather than "bitching and moaning" as someone else suggested - diplomacy is usually a better long term basis for having a good relationship with your vendor. Often it's useful to point out discussions like this which indicate that it's been enabled for other people.
+1. We politely said to Arista, "We like your box, but we're afraid that if we can't use our existing optics, we'd all miss out on a good opportunity working together". That did the job. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP, (continued)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Denys Fedoryshchenko (Aug 18)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Mike Hammett (Aug 18)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Denys Fedoryshchenko (Aug 18)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Nick Hilliard (Aug 18)
- RE: Arista unqualified SFP Ryan DiRocco (Aug 18)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Ryan, Spencer (Aug 18)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Mark Tinka (Aug 18)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Tim Jackson (Aug 18)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Mark Tinka (Aug 18)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Nick Hilliard (Aug 18)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Mark Tinka (Aug 18)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Fredrik Korsbäck (Aug 18)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Ethan (Aug 18)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Stanislaw (Aug 18)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP John A. Kilpatrick (Aug 20)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Tim Jackson (Aug 20)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Ricky Beam (Aug 18)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Eric Kuhnke (Aug 18)
- RE: Arista unqualified SFP Ryan DiRocco (Aug 19)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Alain Hebert (Aug 19)
- Re: Arista unqualified SFP Eric Kuhnke (Aug 19)