nanog mailing list archives

Re: DNS Services for a registrar


From: Mehmet Akcin <mehmet () akcin net>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:07:03 -0700

On a serious note, what are the providers out there that can do a decent
secondary dns hosting service?. looks like a lot of people stopped offering
this service for bulk amount of domains at reasonable price. Let's say
(100K domains)

mehmet

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote:


In message <CAGFn2k2+8zq8hjDQFwSaZ+s2Z6DTZOCWD_nnW+_4e0mgP7J5Mw@
mail.gmail.com>
, Rubens Kuhl writes:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Filip Hruska <fhr () fhrnet eu> wrote:

Hi,

If you are going the IaaS route, definitely checkout KnotDNS project.
According to their benchmarks [1], it does much better than other DNS
servers in about every workload.


The problem with KnotDNS/Yadifa/NSD is that they are too optimized for
servers with a small number of zones containing large numbers of records,
usually delegation-only. That is the use of TLD registries, but not the
use
case of registrars...

... all those 3 are getting better in supporting large number of zones
with
small number of records, but the canonical solution in that space is
Power
DNS. Things that TLDs usually don't like, SQL-backend for instance, makes
perfect sense for this use case.

Note that the only workload they tested is serving the root zone, not
multiple number of zones with variable number of RR-sets... so aligning
the
testing with the actual use case is crucial to make good decisions.

What I strongly support, though, is getting out of the BIND comfort zone.

Named will support millions of zones and they don't need to be
listed in named.conf.  BIND 9.11 supports catalog zone which is a
meta zone which says what zones the server should configure itself
for and where to transfer those zones from, etc.

Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org



Current thread: