![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Microwave link capacity
From: Jean-Francois Mezei <jfmezei_nanog () vaxination ca>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:52:47 -0400
On 2016-04-07 08:28, Bryan Fields wrote:
Microwave has it's place, but the 20 mile, >1gb links are marketing more than anything.
So existing long distance links to reach rural communities are not good candidates to upgrade from old microwave that handles just phone to something that can serve broadband for the town ? If existing towers are further apart than what is realistic for higher capacity links, then upgrading would involve new towers at which point, the economics might point to fibre.
Current thread:
- Microwave link capacity Jean-Francois Mezei (Apr 04)
- RE: Microwave link capacity Tyler Applebaum (Apr 04)
- Re: Microwave link capacity joel jaeggli (Apr 04)
- Re: Microwave link capacity Cryptographrix (Apr 04)
- Re: Microwave link capacity Josh Luthman (Apr 04)
- Re: Microwave link capacity Mike Hammett (Apr 04)
- RE: Microwave link capacity Huffman, Timothy (Apr 05)
- Re: Microwave link capacity Robert Glover (Apr 05)
- Re: Microwave link capacity Bryan Fields (Apr 07)
- Re: Microwave link capacity Jean-Francois Mezei (Apr 07)
- Re: Microwave link capacity Faisal Imtiaz (Apr 07)
- RE: Microwave link capacity Huffman, Timothy (Apr 05)
- Re: Microwave link capacity Jean-Francois Mezei (Apr 04)
- Re: Microwave link capacity mike . lyon (Apr 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Microwave link capacity Scott Weeks (Apr 04)