nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic
From: Max Tulyev <maxtul () netassist ua>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 18:37:54 +0300
That's the problem. Nobody want to say which customer (IP) violates which policy. On 10.04.16 18:31, A.L.M.Buxey () lboro ac uk wrote:
give clients their own bigger blocks - or identify the clients violating policy (what the policy they are violating?) - you'll probably find the ones getting the captchas are the ones violating! ;-)
Current thread:
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic, (continued)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Chuck Anderson (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Max Tulyev (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Damian Menscher via NANOG (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 12)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Filip Hruska (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Harald Koch (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Max Tulyev (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Mike Hammett (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Niels Bakker (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic A . L . M . Buxey (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Max Tulyev (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Brielle (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Josh Luthman (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Baldur Norddahl (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Peter Kristolaitis (Apr 10)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Bjørn Mork (Apr 11)
- Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic Eitan Adler (Apr 11)