Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions

[Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish () gmail com>]

Again Fabien,

Why didn't you use A10 for both detection and mitigation?

Thanks,

Ramy

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Fabien Delmotte <fdelmotte1 () mac com> wrote:

> Hello
>
> My 2 cents
> You can use Wanguard for the detection and A10 for the mitigation, you
> have just to play with the API.
>
> Regards
>
> Fabien
>
> > Le 12 août 2015 à 16:28, Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish () gmail com> a écrit
> :
> > > Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:14:54 +0200
> > > From: "marcel.duregards () yahoo fr" <marcel.duregards () yahoo fr>
> > > To: nanog () nanog org
> > > Subject: Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
> > > Message-ID: <55C992DE.3020906 () yahoo fr>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
> > >
> > > anybody from this impressive list ?:
> > >
> > > https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers
> > >
> > > -- Marcel
> > Anybody here compared Wanguard's performance with the DDoS vendors in the
> > market (Arbor, Radware, NSFocus, A10, RioRey, Staminus, F5 ......)?
> >
> > Another question, have anybody from the reviewers tested the false
> > positives of the box, or experienced any false positive incidents?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ramy