nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments
From: Josh Moore <jmoore () atcnetworks net>
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 19:12:55 +0000
We are talking a purely bridged environment. However, I have been wondering how in the world end-to-end IPv6 connectivity is supposed to work if a customer hooks up their own router. That is one of the points of IPv6... Joshua Moore Network Engineer ATC Broadband 912.632.3161 - O | 912.218.3720 - M -----Original Message----- From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 3:08 PM To: Josh Moore Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 19:04:06 -0000, Josh Moore said:
I'm reading that the recommended method for assigning IPv6 addresses to end-users is to do this via a dedicated VLAN and /64.
Important question - are you talking about the IPv6 address supplied to the CPE router itself, or a /48 or /56 delegated to the CPE router to allocate to subnets and devices behind it?
Current thread:
- IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- RE: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 08)
- RE: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- RE: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Matthew Kaufman (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Mark Tinka (Sep 09)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)
- RE: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Josh Moore (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Baldur Norddahl (Sep 08)
- Re: IPv6 Subscriber Access Deployments Owen DeLong (Sep 09)