nanog mailing list archives
Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it.
From: Connor Wilkins <connorwilkins () ruggedinbox com>
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 21:14:02 +0000
On 2015-09-06 19:18, Scott Weeks wrote:
It could be much easier. Folks that care about the mailing list rules, want to be courteous to list folks and want to use their company email, rather than one that inserts no disclaimer, could put 15 lines of blank as part of their signature. This would force all the crap far enough down the page that it wouldn't be bothersome. scott
Everyone:Honestly.. the best method is to not let it bug you anymore. It's only a seething issue to you because you let it be.
You're suggesting that one use 15 blank lines just so that you don't have to see any of these self-inflicted transgressions. It would be much simpler and less taxing on all involved to simply not let it bother you anymore.
"Impossible!" you may cry.. but I don't believe so. I used to be the same. It's easily beatable. You could send twenty paragraphs of so-called 'legal text' suffixed to your email and I wouldn't so much as bat an eye. It may take some personal effort but you need to learn to 'let it go'.
This is a non-issue in the scope of things and you've made a mountain out of this grain of sand. Brush it aside and move on. It isn't worth your time.
Current thread:
- Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Larry Sheldon (Sep 04)
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Aaron C. de Bruyn (Sep 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Larry Sheldon (Sep 04)
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Stephen Satchell (Sep 04)
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Robert Drake (Sep 06)
- Message not available
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Larry Sheldon (Sep 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Scott Weeks (Sep 06)
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Connor Wilkins (Sep 06)
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Rich Kulawiec (Sep 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Larry Sheldon (Sep 08)
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Dovid Bender (Sep 09)
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Alan Buxey (Sep 09)
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Dovid Bender (Sep 09)
- RE: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Tony Hain (Sep 09)
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Oliver O'Boyle (Sep 09)
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Connor Wilkins (Sep 06)
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. John Levine (Sep 09)
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 09)
- Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it. Stephen Satchell (Sep 09)