nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google IMAP (with k9mail)
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:10:13 +0530
Not protocols as much as less secure ssl ciphers is my guess --srs
On 23-Oct-2015, at 9:50 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote: ----- Original Message -----From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com>Incoming settings IMAP server: imap.gmail.com Port: 993 Security type: SSL (always) Outgoing settings SMTP server: smtp.gmail.com Port: 465 Security type: SSL (always)Hijack: to use k9mail with gmail IMAP, I have to enable "allow less secure clients" in the gmail web UI, but neither the Gmail people nor the k9mail people seem to want to actually document which protocol is disliked or required. Anyone have any actual facts on this point? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
Current thread:
- Google IMAP Nathanael Cariaga (Oct 20)
- Re: Google IMAP Christopher Morrow (Oct 20)
- Re: Google IMAP (with k9mail) Jay Ashworth (Oct 23)
- Re: Google IMAP (with k9mail) Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 23)
- Re: Google IMAP (with k9mail) Nikolay Shopik (Oct 23)
- Re: Google IMAP (with k9mail) Jay Ashworth (Oct 23)
- Re: Google IMAP Jason Hellenthal (Oct 20)
- Re: Google IMAP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 20)
- Re: Google IMAP Christopher Morrow (Oct 20)
- Re: Google IMAP Nathanael Cariaga (Oct 20)
- Re: Google IMAP Stephen Satchell (Oct 20)
- Re: Google IMAP Suresh Ramasubramanian (Oct 20)
- Re: Google IMAP Christopher Morrow (Oct 20)