nanog mailing list archives
RE: IGP choice
From: Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik () civeo com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 19:21:37 +0000
And Windows Server for your routing platform of choice! -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Damien Burke Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 1:12 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: IGP choice Just use rip for *everything* Problem solved! -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:41 AM To: marcel.duregards () yahoo fr; nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: IGP choice On 22/Oct/15 18:57, marcel.duregards () yahoo fr wrote:
Hi everyone, Anybody from Yahoo to share experience on IGP choice ? IS-IS vs OSPF, why did you switch from one to the other, for what reason ? Same question could apply to other ISP, I'd like to heard some international ISP/carriers design choice, please.
The "everything must connect to Area 0" requirement of OSPF was limiting for me back in 2008. So we moved to IS-IS. Mark.
Current thread:
- IGP choice marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Niels Bakker (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Matthew Petach (Oct 23)
- RE: IGP choice Jameson, Daniel (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Pablo Lucena (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Oct 23)
- Re: IGP choice marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Oct 26)
- Re: IGP choice Niels Bakker (Oct 22)
- RE: IGP choice Damien Burke (Oct 22)
- RE: IGP choice Steve Mikulasik (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Randy via NANOG (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Dave Bell (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Mark Tinka (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice sthaug (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Baldur Norddahl (Oct 22)
- Re: IGP choice Pablo Lucena (Oct 22)