nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP hold timer on IX LAN
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:20:05 +0100
On 27/10/2015 08:31, marcel.duregards () yahoo fr wrote:
I'm asking because we see more and more peering partners which force the hold timer to a lower value, and when BGP negotiate the timer, the lowest hold timer is the winner.
You need to be careful with this. On larger IXPs, there will be a wide variety of kit with different capabilities, which will usually work well in most circumstances, but which may not have enough cpu power to handle edge cases like e.g. ixp maintenance or flaps when you get large amounts of bgp activity. A low bgp timer might be fine for, say an asr9k or an mx960 with the latest RE/RSP, but would be actively harmful if one of your peers is using an mx80 or a sup720. Nick
Current thread:
- BGP hold timer on IX LAN marcel.duregards () yahoo fr (Oct 27)
- Re: BGP hold timer on IX LAN Nikolay Shopik (Oct 27)
- Re: BGP hold timer on IX LAN Nick Hilliard (Oct 27)
- Re: BGP hold timer on IX LAN Colin Johnston (Oct 27)