Re: Uptick in spam

[Andrew Kirch <trelane () trelane net>]

not even close to more discussing than from the original spam.  Not even
close.

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik () civeo com>
wrote:

> I think there might be more emails discussing the spam, than the actual
> spam itself.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Ian Smith
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 12:34 PM
> To: Paras <paras () protrafsolutions com>
> Cc: nanog () nanog org
> Subject: Re: Uptick in spam
>
> Filtering *@jdlabs.fr did the trick for me.
>
> Of course, now I have to write a much more complex filter to hide all the
> complaining about NANOG spam :)
>
> Ian Smith
> ________________________________________
>
> 161 South St. Hightstown, NJ
> 201-315-1316 phone
> ian.w.smith () gmail com
>
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Paras <paras () protrafsolutions com>
> wrote:
>
> > I see it too, there are some 517 messages in my spam folder "New message"
> >
> > Most of them get blocked, but a small fraction are still making it
> > into my inbox
> >
> >
> > On 10/25/2015 12:13 AM, anthony kasza wrote:
> >
> > > Has there been a recent uptick in crap sent to the list or is it just
> me?
> > > Is there anything that we can do to filter these messages with junk
> links?
> > > -AK