nanog mailing list archives
Re: spam smackdown?
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:03:26 -0400
On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Jim Popovitch <jimpop () gmail com> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Scott Weeks <surfer () mauigateway com> wrote:
It looks like someone's trying to make a point.The takeaway is: 1) NANOG doesn't seem to do simple inbound spam filtering :-)
In fairness to the Communications Committee (of which I have zero influence or power), a few points: 1) They apparently filtered it more than a day ago, we are just seeing the queue drain. Which is not surprising on a mailing list of > 10K email addresses. 2) Inbound spam filtering is VERY HARD on something like NANOG. How many people here post things like samples of spam? Imagine the backlash: “This is an operational list. How could you not expect operational content to include samples?!?!?! AAARRGGGGGHHHHHHHh HRHFLSHFBEAW% ^&*DKJHFSLkdjh@#%asltrifhuawlekhtfweq5r1r#@%!@#QWEGDAwsgfhqw!!!!111!!!!” (That is honestly what I expect of some posters here….) 3) Anyone who feels this is so frickin’ bad it is unbearable, and knows they could do SO MUCH BETTER themselves, should volunteer for the Communications Committee. Otherwise, everyone should thank the unpaid volunteers for their gracious and excellent work day after day, year after year. Or just STFU. For my part, I would just like to thank the CC members. I think they do a most amazing job, and deserve of humblest gratitude. -- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- spam smackdown? Scott Weeks (Oct 26)
- Re: spam smackdown? Murat Yuksel (Oct 26)
- Re: spam smackdown? Jim Popovitch (Oct 26)
- Re: spam smackdown? Todd Underwood (Oct 26)
- Re: spam smackdown? Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 26)
- thank you Re: spam smackdown? Jim Mercer (Oct 26)
- Re: spam smackdown? John Springer (Oct 27)
- Re: spam smackdown? William Herrin (Oct 28)
- Re: spam smackdown? Ishmael Rufus (Oct 26)
- RE: spam smackdown? Kain, Rebecca (.) (Oct 26)