nanog mailing list archives
Re: *tap tap* is this thing on?
From: Joe Abley <jabley () hopcount ca>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:24:44 -0400
On Oct 26, 2015, at 13:10, Brielle Bruns <bruns () 2mbit com> wrote:
This spam flood is kinda hilarious in a way. Any idea why no one with mod or admin privs for the mailing list has bothered to step in and deal with this?
I asked a similar question myself on another list. But then after a minute's reflection, the fact that we all got 200+ messages like this on the NANOG list and not a single other message complaining about it suggests that someone did actually hit the big red moderation button promptly, and just waited until Monday to sort it out (which would not have been completely unreasonable, I think). The residual messages that tricked through after that seem likely to be nothing more than outbound queues draining. Joe
Current thread:
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on?, (continued)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Brielle Bruns (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Josh Luthman (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Marcin Cieslak (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Brielle Bruns (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Jim Popovitch (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Chris Knipe (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Tom Taylor (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Bob Evans (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Larry Sheldon (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Brielle Bruns (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Rich Kulawiec (Oct 27)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Brielle Bruns (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Joe Abley (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Brielle Bruns (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Andrew Kirch (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Brielle Bruns (Oct 26)
- Re: *tap tap* is this thing on? Dovid Bender (Oct 28)