nanog mailing list archives
RE: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?
From: "Keith Medcalf" <kmedcalf () dessus com>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 09:50:13 -0700
Why uncomfortable? How do you know this is not how the company executive that came up with the idea did so? (So that he or she could watch unlimited bestiality videos).
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of nanog- isp () mail com Sent: Sunday, 22 November, 2015 16:30 To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? So, which porn sites are zero rated? Uh, asking for a friend. (Would love to be a fly on the wall when those and other uncomfortable requests to join come in.) Jared
Current thread:
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?, (continued)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Owen DeLong (Nov 23)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Mark Andrews (Nov 23)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Keenan Tims (Nov 23)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Mike Hammett (Nov 24)
- RE: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Tony Hain (Nov 26)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Sander Steffann (Nov 24)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Jean-Francois Mezei (Nov 25)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Jean-Francois Mezei (Nov 25)
- Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Niels Bakker (Nov 23)
- RE: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality? Keith Medcalf (Nov 28)