nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bluehost.com
From: "Bob Evans" <bob () FiberInternetCenter com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:19:54 -0800
For an ISP type service - it's almost impossible the make it up in volume - all you need is one phone call to cost you $10 in support on a $3.50 service. With that many customers you can imagine how many call to just ask what happened or vent after the event is over. I founded a cable modem business prior to docsis standard. Call center with 150 people in it. People would call for help with their printer just because we answered the phone. So support for a $3.49 web service must make compromises somewhere in an attempt to reach profitability. I know of 3 very big ISPs - all barely making money for years. Providing crummy service , priced cheaply and expecting to make it up in volume. Their solution was to merge and lose money together. Still providing a lowball price for service , they then took the profitable parts of the business and sold those to others so they can re-org and improve cash momentarily. The re-org produced the same low prices and crummy service. So it's a cycle some people play just to win money from hedge funds, investors and finally the public. What do they call it when one keeps doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result ? Low priced services are difficult to make profitable - if you drove your car the way most low priced business services operate you would have a car that top speeds at the minimal freeway speed, wouldnt carry a a spare tire, drive around until the empty light turns on and carry as little insurance as possible. - Gee, come to think of it, I've been in an airport shuttle van like that in new york. Thank You Bob Evans CTO
However, with thousands more users at that price point, you would think the income would be plenty for better services. Who makes more, the store with smaller quantities at higher prices or the store that sells more bulk at lower prices? Perception of value, I believe, wins. Robert On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 16:00:37 -0800 "Bob Evans" <bob () FiberInternetCenter com> wrote:Yes, I agree with you Joe - a hasty generalization, as "you get what you pay for" doesn't really apply to as many goods in the same way it does to almost all services. However, a $3.49 web site service should have be a good first clue. Thank You Bob Evans CTOWalmart has cheap prices so "you get what you pay for."?? Hasty generalization but I can't disagree 100% with your opinion on this one. I am learning about the non-profit world of IT and the challenges are all around me. :) -- Later, Joe On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Bob Evans <bob () fiberinternetcenter com> wrote:Gee, for $3.49 for a website hosting per month , it's a real bargain. While the network person inside me says, Wow that's a long outage. The other part of me is really wondering what one thinks they can really expect from a company that hosts a website for just $3.49 ? Such a bargain at less than 1/2 the price of a single hot dog at a baseball stadium per month. That price point alone tells you about the setup and what you are agreeing too and who it's built for. Goes along with the ol' saying, "you get what you pay for." If they are down for 10 hours a month out of the average 720 hours in a month - thats a tiny percentage 1-2 of the time it's unavailable - in service terms of dollars it's roughly a nickel they credit each customer. Do I need more coffee or is my math wrong about a nickel for 10 hours of website hosing ? However, maybe that is all many companies /sites really need. In which case, it should be easy enough to build in backup yourself using two cheap hosing providers and flip between them when the need arises. Or pick a provider that manages their routing well and works with you quickly, but, you'll have to pay more for that. Yep, the math spells it out - "you get what you pay for." Thank You Bob Evans CTOremember folks, redundancy is the savior of all f***ups. :) On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:21 PM, JoeSox <joesox () gmail com> wrote:I just waited 160 minutes for a tech call and the Bluehost techtold mehe was able to confirm that it wasn't malicious activity that tookdown thedatacenter but rather it was caused by a "datacenter issue". So my first thought is someone didn't design the topologycorrectly orsomething. Some of our emails are coming thru but Google DNS still lost allof ourDNS zones which are hosted by Bluehost. At least the #bluehostdown is fun to read :/ -- Later, Joe On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr> wrote:On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 08:41:55AM -0800, JoeSox <joesox () gmail com> wrote a message of 9 lines which said:Anyone have the scope on the outage for Bluehost? https://twitter.com/search?q=%23bluehostdown&src=tyahThe two name servers ns1.bluehost.com and ns2.bluehost.com areawfullyslow to respond: % check-soa -i picturemotion.com ns1.bluehost.com. 74.220.195.31: OK: 2012092007 (1382 ms) ns2.bluehost.com. 69.89.16.4: OK: 2012092007 (1388 ms) As a result, most clients timeout. May be a DoS against the name servers? bluehost.com itself is DNS-hosted on a completely different architecture. So it works fine. But the nginx Web site replies502Gateway timeout, probably overloaded by all the clients tryingto getinformed. The Twitter accounts of Bluehost do not distribute any useful information.
Current thread:
- Re: Bluehost.com, (continued)
- Re: Bluehost.com Brielle Bruns (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com Grant Ridder (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com Stephane Bortzmeyer (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com JoeSox (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com JoeSox (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com Andrew Kirch (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com Bob Evans (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com JoeSox (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com Bob Evans (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com Robert Webb (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com Bob Evans (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com alvin nanog (Nov 25)
- RE: Bluehost.com Kiriki Delany (Nov 26)
- RE: Bluehost.com Bob Evans (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com Matthew Petach (Nov 28)
- Re: Bluehost.com Bob Evans (Nov 28)
- Re: Bluehost.com Matthew Petach (Nov 29)
- RE: Bluehost.com Kiriki Delany (Nov 30)
- Re: Bluehost.com JoeSox (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com Brielle Bruns (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com Keith Kouzmanoff (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com Matt Palmer (Nov 25)
- Re: Bluehost.com Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 25)