nanog mailing list archives
[no subject]
From: "Watson, Bob via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 01:36:42 +0000 (UTC)
--- Begin Message --- From: "Watson, Bob" <Bob.Watson () wwt com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 01:36:39 +0000
Many of these churn rates result from problems self inflicted hence all the dramatic sdn promises, popularity in abstractions, Api all the things, let's go yang/netconf and retrofit every ietf standard. There's benefits but gotta rant a little. What's better than correct? Well over correct of course.On May 7, 2015, at 12:17 PM, Josh Reynolds <josh () spitwspots com> wrote: You know where these people wouldn't fit? W/ISPs. Every three years or so you are forklifting the majority of your wireless PtMP for either a new series or a totally different vendor. New backhaul vendors often. You're building AC and DC power plants. You likely touch Cisco, juniper, HP, mikrotik, ubiquiti, Linux, windows, *BSD/pfsense, lucent, accedian/ciena, etc due to various client and network requirements all in the same week, AND you have to make them work together nicely :) It's not the environment for somebody like that, and I truly don't understand how people of that.. "caliber" end up working on large scale WANs and global transit networks. Frankly, it scares me a bit.On May 7, 2015 9:07:35 AM AKDT, Craig <cvuljanic () gmail com> wrote: we do "cry" when we interview people that claim to have "advanced knowledge" of BGP and we ask them some very basic BGP questions, and we get a blank stare..... On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Rob Seastrom <rs () seastrom com> wrote:Josh Reynolds <josh () spitwspots com> writes:It really bothers me to see that people in this industry are so worried about a change of syntax or terminology. If there's one thing about the big vendors that bothers me, it's that these batteries of vendor specific tests have allowed many "techs" to get lazy. They simply can't seem to operate well, if at all, in a non-Cisco (primarily) environment.If that bothers you, I recommend you not look at what passes for a "system administrator" these days. It will make you cry. -r-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--- End Message ---
Current thread:
- RE: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR), (continued)
- RE: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Phil Bedard (May 06)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Mick O'Donovan (May 07)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Tim Franklin (May 07)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Josh Reynolds (May 07)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Rob Seastrom (May 07)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Josh Reynolds (May 07)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Rob Seastrom (May 07)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Josh Reynolds (May 07)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Craig (May 07)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Josh Reynolds (May 07)
- [no subject] Watson, Bob via NANOG (May 07)
- Message not available
- [no subject] Josh Reynolds via NANOG (May 07)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Watson, Bob (May 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Larry Sheldon (May 08)
- Message not available
- Mailing list messages with attachments (was Re:) Larry Sheldon (May 08)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Tim Franklin (May 07)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Chris Boyd (May 07)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Craig (May 07)
- Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) Trent Farrell (May 07)
- [no subject] Mark Tinka via NANOG (May 07)