nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCC releases Open Internet document
From: Lamar Owen <lowen () pari edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:23:35 -0400
On 03/12/2015 02:02 PM, Rob McEwen wrote:
Nevertheless, in such a circumstance, 47 USC 230(c)(2) should prevail and trump any such interpretation of this!Found it; paragraph 532 addresses 230(c). In a nutshell, the applicability does not change due to the reclassification of BIAS providers as telecommunications services.(If anyone thinks that 47 USC 230(c)(2) might not prevail over such an interpretation, please let me know... and let me know why?)
Current thread:
- FCC releases Open Internet document Ca By (Mar 12)
- Re: FCC releases Open Internet document shawn wilson (Mar 12)
- Re: FCC releases Open Internet document William Kenny (Mar 12)
- Re: FCC releases Open Internet document Rob McEwen (Mar 12)
- Re: FCC releases Open Internet document Lamar Owen (Mar 12)
- Re: FCC releases Open Internet document Lamar Owen (Mar 12)
- Re: FCC releases Open Internet document Mike A (Mar 12)
- RE: FCC releases Open Internet document Hass, Douglas A. (Mar 12)
- Re: FCC releases Open Internet document William Kenny (Mar 12)
- Re: FCC releases Open Internet document shawn wilson (Mar 12)
- Re: FCC releases Open Internet document Bryan Tong (Mar 12)
- Re: FCC releases Open Internet document Lamar Owen (Mar 12)
- Re: FCC releases Open Internet document Lamar Owen (Mar 12)
- Re: FCC releases Open Internet document Livingood, Jason (Mar 12)