nanog mailing list archives
Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND
From: shawn wilson <ag4ve.us () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 14:58:56 -0400
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015, 14:16 Harlan Stenn <stenn () ntp org> wrote:
shawn wilson writes:... I mean letting computers figure out slower earth rotation on the fly would seem more accurate than leap seconds anyway. And then all of us who do earthly things and would like simpler libraries could live in peace.Really? Have you looked in to those calculations, and I'm only talking about the allegedly predictable parts of those calculations, not things like the jetstream, the circumpolar currents, or earthquakes.
Ok, forget that point - AFAIK, the only things that matter wrt time is agreement on interval/counter and epoch, and stability. Right now we only have agreement on interval. So while I'd prefer a consistent epoch and counter, I'll live with whatever as we have access to board agreement and stability (like this doesn't hit NANOG every time with "uh oh").
Current thread:
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND, (continued)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND shawn wilson (Jun 22)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Tony Finch (Jun 22)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Damian Menscher via NANOG (Jun 24)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Tony Finch (Jun 25)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Stefan Schlesinger (Jun 25)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Damian Menscher via NANOG (Jun 25)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Tore Anderson (Jun 25)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Harlan Stenn (Jun 22)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Harlan Stenn (Jun 20)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND shawn wilson (Jun 20)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Mel Beckman (Jun 19)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Majdi S. Abbas (Jun 19)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Harlan Stenn (Jun 19)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Baldur Norddahl (Jun 19)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Harlan Stenn (Jun 19)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Mel Beckman (Jun 19)
- Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND Harlan Stenn (Jun 20)