nanog mailing list archives
Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?
From: Joe Hamelin <joe () nethead com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:08:38 -0700
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Rafael Possamai <rafael () gav ufsc br> wrote:
You're welcome. I hope that helps. On another note, if your internet pipe in Europe isn't as stable as your pipe in the US, then you could also try and have your infrastructure provider blend your uplink with two or more carrier-grade paths. You wouldn't have to worry about signing up for and maintaining an AS, but you could improve your uptime significantly.
It seems to be more of a last-mile backhoe fade issue right now. I'm trying to convince them that a manufacturing facility isn't a good place for a data center. -- Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
Current thread:
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?, (continued)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Rob Seastrom (Jun 20)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Tony Finch (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Bill Woodcock (Jun 19)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Hamelin (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Rafael Possamai (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Hamelin (Jun 15)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? William Herrin (Jun 16)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Hamelin (Jun 16)
- RE: Anycast provider for SMTP? Chuck Church (Jun 17)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Joe Abley (Jun 17)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Ray Soucy (Jun 17)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Kurt Kraut via NANOG (Jun 18)
- Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? Christopher Morrow (Jun 18)