nanog mailing list archives
Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak?
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 22:41:32 -0400
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Rafael Possamai <rafael () gav ufsc br> wrote:
Well, I was wondering the same. I am guessing it depends on the SLA contract since they are all very unique and specific.
I'm going to bet that aside from a few one-off cases the SLA in question talks about maintaining reachability inside L3's network, or maybe even 'is your link up and can you ping the L3 gateway router you connect to?' SLA's aren't meant to actually get paid out...
Current thread:
- Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak?, (continued)
- Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak? Mel Beckman (Jun 14)
- Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak? Rubens Kuhl (Jun 14)
- Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak? ryanL (Jun 14)
- Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak? B (Jun 14)
- Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak? Rafael Possamai (Jun 14)
- Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak? Randy Bush (Jun 14)
- Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak? Mark Tinka (Jun 15)
- RE: [SPAM]Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak? Evan Moore (Jun 15)
- Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak? Aftab Siddiqui (Jun 14)
- Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak? Rafael Possamai (Jun 14)
- Re: AS4788 Telecom Malaysia major route leak? Christopher Morrow (Jun 14)