nanog mailing list archives

Re: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6


From: Laszlo Hanyecz <laszlo () heliacal net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 02:31:37 +0000

"Your phone doesn't work with our network, so you should buy one that does"
vs
"Hey we can't connect, fix your network"

Kind of similar to the streaming video vs eyeball network thing.. blaming the bad user experience on the other guy.

-Laszlo



On Jun 12, 2015, at 2:18 AM, Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com> wrote:

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo () colitti com> wrote:
Ray,

please do not construe my words on this thread as being Google's position
on anything. These messages were sent from my personal email address, and I
do not speak for my employer.

Regards,
Lorenzo


Ah, Lorenzo, Lorenzo...

I was going to just let the thread go quietly by until you pulled
out the "I'm not speaking for my employer" card.  :(

Can we take what you posted here
https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=32621#c53
from your google.com account to be official Google
position, when you closed the issue requesting DHCPv6
support as "Declined?"

Again, in comment #109
https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=32621#c109
you speak from your Google.com account when you repeat
*twice* the position that you won't support stateful DHCPv6:
"and not via stateful DHCPv6 address assignment" followed by
"while continuing not to support DHCPv6 address assignment."

It's hard to not see _that_ as being Google's position, when you
post it from your google.com account in response to an issue raised
about broken functionality on the Android platform.  So perhaps
you're right, and the words you use on _this_ thread are your
personal opinion; unfortunately, they seem to be the same
words and opinions you use from your google.com account when
denying input from Android users who don't seem to want
their devices to be crippled by incomplete DHCPv6 support.

I wonder at what point large enterprises will simply say
"sorry, without working DHCPv6 support, Android devices
will not be supported on this network"--at which point this
will stop being a religious issue, and will shift to being a
business issue, as Google will have to decide whether
being stubbornly dogmatic while losing large customers
is worth it or not.

Thanks!

Matt

PS--just because some poor unfortunate soul found a
way to scrape neighbor tables to work around the lack
of DHCPv6 lease logs does *not* make it a practical
or wise alternative.   A certain network has been trying
to test out that workaround, and every time they scrape
the neighbor table, the CPU on the routers pegs at 100%.

PPS--I am likewise posting this from my personal
account (which is still running an old enough Cisco
image that it pre-dates IPv6 support entirely, making
most of this a moot point for me personally).   The
opinions expressed here are purely my own, and
should in no way be construed to apply to anyone
but myself, and possibly the mice living in the garage.


Current thread: