nanog mailing list archives
Re: Route leak in Bangladesh
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy () tislabs com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:44:00 -0400
On Jun 30, 2015, at 9:41 AM, Job Snijders <job () instituut net> wrote:
In addition to the BGP community scheme, outbound as-path filters could help. Most network's list of transit providers is fairly static, it would be easiy with as-path filters to prevent announcing upstream routes to other upstreams or peering partners.
Except that this was not a route leak per se. The announced routes AS_PATH shows them as originated by the offending AS, not *propagated* by the offending AS. So the outbound AS_PATH did not retain the upstream portion of the path. --Sandy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Current thread:
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh, (continued)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Matsuzaki Yoshinobu (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Randy Bush (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Matsuzaki Yoshinobu (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Mark Tinka (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Nick Hilliard (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Job Snijders (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Joe Abley (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Job Snijders (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Mark Tinka (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Job Snijders (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Randy Bush (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Matsuzaki Yoshinobu (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Sandra Murphy (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Justin M. Streiner (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Sandra Murphy (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Job Snijders (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Graham Beneke (Jun 30)
- Re: Route leak in Bangladesh Justin M. Streiner (Jun 30)