nanog mailing list archives
RE: Windows 10 Release
From: Alan Buxey <A.L.M.Buxey () lboro ac uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:54:19 +0100
'QoS problems are to be expected' . Uh? Don't you put QoS into place just to ensure that the minimum bandwidth you need to ensure critical services (such that your voice traffic is not impeded for example) are NOT affected across your WAN links when there are big globs of data banging around? Surely, If anything, this is the one case and time when the QoS deployment effort can be shown to have value (obviously the policies would already have been validated against saturated links as part of sign off) alan
Current thread:
- RE: Windows 10 Release, (continued)
- RE: Windows 10 Release Matthew Black (Jul 30)
- Re: Windows 10 Release Scott Helms (Jul 30)
- Re: Windows 10 Release Brooks Bridges (Jul 30)
- Re: Windows 10 Release Scott Helms (Jul 30)
- Re: Windows 10 Release Joe Greco (Jul 30)
- Re: Windows 10 Release Justin Mckillican (Jul 30)
- Re: Windows 10 Release Scott Helms (Jul 30)
- Re: Windows 10 Release Joe Greco (Jul 30)
- RE: Windows 10 Release Childs, Aaron (Jul 30)
- RE: Windows 10 Release Alan Buxey (Jul 29)
- Re: Windows 10 Release Larry Sheldon (Jul 29)
- Re: Windows 10 Release Tiernan OToole (Jul 30)
- RE: Windows 10 Release STARNES, CURTIS (Jul 30)
- RE: Windows 10 Release Martin Hotze (Jul 30)
- RE: Windows 10 Release STARNES, CURTIS (Jul 30)
- Re: Windows 10 Release Stefan Neufeind (Jul 30)